The status of students at the Yale School of Management is governed by all applicable Yale policies. This chapter includes some of the most important among those policies.
The Yale School of Management is committed to the protection of free inquiry and expression in the classroom and throughout the school community. In this, the School reflects the University’s commitment to freedom of expression as eloquently stated in the Woodward Report (Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression at Yale, 1975), which states, in part:
The primary function of a university is to discover and disseminate knowledge by means of research and teaching. To fulfill this function a free interchange of ideas is necessary not only within its walls but with the world beyond as well. It follows that the university must do everything possible to ensure within it the fullest degree of intellectual freedom. The history of intellectual growth and discovery clearly demonstrates the need for unfettered freedom, the right to think the unthinkable, discuss the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. To curtail free expression strikes twice at intellectual freedom, for whoever deprives another of the right to state unpopular views necessarily also deprives others of the right to listen to those views.…
For if a university is a place for knowledge, it is also a special kind of small society. Yet it is not primarily a fellowship, a club, a circle of friends, a replica of the civil society outside it. Without sacrificing its central purpose, it cannot make its primary and dominant value the fostering of friendship, solidarity, harmony, civility, or mutual respect. To be sure, these are important values; other institutions may properly assign them the highest, and not merely a subordinate priority; and a good university will seek and may in some significant measure attain these ends. But it will never let these values, important as they are, override its central purpose. We value freedom of expression precisely because it provides a forum for the new, the provocative, the disturbing, and the unorthodox. Free speech is a barrier to the tyranny of authoritarian or even majority opinion as to the rightness or wrongness of particular doctrines or thoughts.…
In addition to the university’s primary obligation to protect free expression there are also ethical responsibilities assumed by each member of the university community, along with the right to enjoy free expression. Though these are much more difficult to state clearly, they are of great importance. If freedom of expression is to serve its purpose, and thus the purpose of the university, it should seek to enhance understanding. Shock, hurt, and anger are not consequences to be weighed lightly. No member of the community with a decent respect for others should use, or encourage others to use, slurs and epithets intended to discredit another’s race, ethnic group, religion, or sex. It may sometimes be necessary in a university for civility and mutual respect to be superseded by the need to guarantee free expression. The values superseded are nevertheless important, and every member of the university community should consider them in exercising the fundamental right to free expression.
The Yale SOM Honor code
Honesty is fundamental to the profession and practice of management. It is therefore the bedrock premise of management education at Yale. To the community of students, faculty, and staff of the Yale School of Management, honesty and integrity build the trust essential to a free and lively exchange of ideas.
The Yale SOM Honor Code is intended to foster the School’s exceptional learning environment and to support conduct that will distinguish the faculty, staff, and students in their lives as managers, at school, at school-related functions, and in the larger management community. The Honor Code will be referred to as the “Code” hereafter.
The Honor Committee has jurisdiction over all Code violations including matters of academic dishonesty and egregious violations of the social and professional norms of behavior.
The Yale SOM community, including faculty, staff, and students, supports the highest standards of academic integrity. All academic work affords an unparalleled opportunity to put forward new and innovative ideas; at SOM, we aspire to always acknowledge the ideas upon which new solutions are based.
When working on any assignment with a team, students must clarify the expectations for each member of the team. Faculty will provide clear guidelines for students on the parameters of any group work. A student will contact the professor for clarification if there is a question about the way in which the group work is to be completed.
Students will familiarize themselves with the standards of proper citation via print and online resources, available on the SOM portal.
A hallmark of the Yale SOM community is its inclusive nature, which respects the diverse backgrounds and views of its members. SOM faculty, students, and alumni aspire to standards of conduct while at Yale, and as they function in the larger management community, that will further distinguish SOM as a center of integrity and fair dealing.
Students must uphold, among themselves, the highest standards of professional behavior.
Students must strictly adhere to ethical guidelines during the job search—with interviewers, prospective employers, and their student colleagues.
Students must remember that they represent the School as they take part in activities in the University, New Haven, and the larger management community.
Standards of individual responsibility in the job search, and in the use of School and University information technology resources, are detailed under Policies and Guidelines of the Career Development Office and Policies on the Use of Information Technology Facilities in this chapter.
Procedures of the Honor Committee
Composition and Charge
The Honor Committee considers instances of academic infractions and other serious violations by Yale SOM students against the SOM and University communities and their guests. The committee is responsible for collecting facts pertaining to such infractions and violations, making judgments about them, and determining punishment where appropriate. In addition, the committee reviews and proposes revisions in SOM discipline policy and procedures where needed and communicates its policies and actions to the community at large.
Suspected cases of cheating or other violations of honor code standards should be reported to the chair of the SOM Honor Committee or the administrative director of the relevant degree program, i.e., the assistant dean of academic affairs and student life for the M.B.A. program; the assistant dean for the M.B.A. for Executives program; or the director of the M.A.M. program. A list of the members of the Honor Committee is available on the SOM portal.
The committee is appointed by the dean. It consists of four faculty members (one of whom shall be designated chair), six SOM students (three from each class in residence, unless modified as under the Process section below), and the assistant dean (who shall act as secretary to the committee and shall be nonvoting). The student members will typically serve for two academic years.
The committee will collect the facts relevant to each complaint under consideration and make judgments on whether an infraction or violation has been committed and on its seriousness to the community. Based on these judgments, the committee will choose a punishment that it deems appropriate to the offense. It shall also inform the community of its actions via the School’s electronic newsletter or other channels it deems appropriate in such a manner as to protect the identity of individuals who are the recipient of punishments.
Although deviations may be taken by the chair when appropriate to a given case, the following steps are customary:
- 1. The work of the committee normally begins when a member of the University community (faculty, student, or staff) brings a probable violation or infraction to the attention of the committee chair. The chair or the chair’s designee then requests a written statement and copies of any other relevant materials pertinent to the complaint.
- 2. Based on these materials, the chair will decide whether the offense, if the charge is true, would be of sufficient seriousness to warrant the attention of the committee. If the complaint is deemed sufficiently serious, the chair or the chair’s designee shall inform the student who is the subject of the complaint. At the same time, the student will be directed to review the Committee Policies and Procedures to apprise the student of his/her rights: (a) to appear before the committee, (b) to be accompanied by any member of the University community to act as his/her adviser,* (c) to examine any and all written materials being provided to the committee as soon as possible, and ordinarily at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting, so that the student may have ample opportunity to question or refute them. At the beginning of a meeting with a student who is the subject of a complaint, the chair will review the Procedures of the Committee and the process to be followed in meetings with the committee.
- The committee chair can do any of the following when a case is brought forward:
- a. Dismiss the case for lack of evidence or insufficient seriousness
- b. Send the case to a subcommittee
- c. Send the case to the full committee
- The subcommittee consists of the committee chair (or another faculty member on the Honor Committee designated by the chair) plus one first-year Yale SOM student and one second-year Yale SOM student, chosen from the full committee. If the accused student is in the M.A.M. or M.B.A. for Executives program, then one of the student members of the subcommittee must be from the respective program. The subcommittee is empowered to take the following actions:
- a. Exoneration
- b. Warning (verbal or written)
- c. Probation
- d. Mandatory F in course (for academic infractions)
- e. Send the case to the full committee
- The accused student may appeal any decision from the subcommittee to the full committee. The student must make the appeal to the committee chair within five working days of the subcommittee’s decision.
- The full committee consists of three first-year Yale SOM students, three second-year Yale SOM students, and at least four faculty members. If the accused student is in the M.A.M. or M.B.A. for Executives program, then at least one of the student members must be from the respective program. The full committee is empowered to take the following actions and may impose other sanctions of intermediate severity:
- a. Exoneration
- b. Warning (verbal or written)
- c. Probation
- d. Mandatory F in course (for academic infractions)
- e. Suspension of one or more terms + mandatory F in course
- f. Expulsion, a permanent separation from Yale SOM
- The appeal of the subcommittee decision to the full committee can result in a sanction more severe than the one originally imposed.
- 3. The committee will endeavor to conduct its business in such a way as to protect the privacy of all individuals who are involved with the case. In addition, it will seek to make its judgments as promptly as is consistent with the need to establish the facts of the case and to come to judgments based on these facts.
- 4. The subcommittee and the full committee will seek to make decisions by consensus. When consensus is impossible, a majority vote will be taken. No decision shall be made without a quorum of committee members (defined as at least two faculty members and three students for the full committee and all members of the subcommittee).
- 5. A penalty of expulsion will appear on a student’s transcript. Correspondence related to any disciplinary penalty will remain in a student’s internal Yale SOM file and in the files of the Honor Committee. A penalty of a full- or partial-term suspension will be reported to an outside agency or individual when a student makes a written request for release of file information to that agency or individual. A penalty of probation will be reported under the same circumstances for a period of time the student is enrolled and will not be released after the student has graduated. Information about warnings will not be released. To provide for some consistency in reactions to offenses year by year, the committee chair shall study the files and inform the committee (ordinarily before the first case of the year is heard) of punishments meted out in certain classes of cases in prior years. Penalties should be set based upon the severity of the infraction, rather than the impact of such penalty on the student’s personal situation.
- 6. The committee chair will inform those against whom complaints have been made of the decisions within twenty-four hours of the committee’s decision.
- 1. At the beginning of the investigation, the chair will inform the subcommittee or full committee members of the individual(s) involved in a case. Committee members will be invited to excuse themselves from the case if there is a conflict of interest. If a committee member is excused and a quorum cannot be met, the chair will recommend to the dean a successor for temporary appointment to the committee for participation in the matter. At the beginning of the investigation, the chair will inform the student whose conduct is in question of the procedures that will be followed and will notify the student of the membership of the committee. Within one day after receiving that notification, the student may object that a member is prejudiced by stating in writing the basis for this objection. On receipt of this objection, the chair will rule on whether the member should be recused from taking part in the proceedings and, if this is done and a quorum cannot be met, will recommend to the dean a successor for temporary appointment to the committee for participation in the matter. A decision of the chair not to recuse the challenged member will be communicated to the student, who may within one day after receiving the notice appeal the decision to the senior associate dean of the relevant academic program. The senior associate dean’s decision to deny or grant the appeal of a conflict of interest will be final.
- 2. At the time the committee informs the student of its decision, it shall also inform the senior associate dean.
- 3. The senior associate dean will offer any student against whom an infraction or violation is found the opportunity to meet with the senior associate dean, as promptly as the dean’s schedule may permit, to raise any objections to the proceedings on the grounds of procedural irregularity or prejudice. If objection is raised, the senior associate dean will investigate the objection and may remand the matter to the committee to correct the procedural irregularity or to re-deliberate after disqualifying the member or members found to be prejudiced. A decision of the senior associate dean that the proceedings were not irregular or that there is insufficient evidence of prejudice will be final.
- 4. The accused student can appeal the severity of the penalty, but not the findings, from the full committee to the Faculty Review Board, which consists of the senior associate dean of the relevant academic program and two faculty members who were not part of the full committee. The student must make the appeal in writing to the relevant senior associate dean within five working days of the full committee’s decision.
- General dissatisfaction with the committee’s decision does not constitute a basis of appeal. The committee chair may submit a written or oral explanation of the committee’s decision to the Faculty Review Board. The student’s written request and supporting materials will be made available to the Review Board, but the student will not be permitted to attend the Review Board meeting. The Review Board’s role in the appeal will be to judge the appropriateness of the punishment assessed by the committee, assuming the correctness of the committee’s finding of a violation. The appeal of the full committee decision to the Faculty Review Board can result in a sanction more severe than the one originally imposed. The decision of the Faculty Review Board is final and not subject to further appeal within the University.
- 5. The ex officio member of the committee (the assistant dean and director of academic affairs and student life) helps steer the case through the process and attends all meetings of the subcommittees and the full committee and the Faculty Review Board.
Records and Files
Records of committee meetings about particular cases will be kept by the assistant dean and director of academic affairs and student life, who will act as secretary to the committee. These records will be kept in a confidential file. Only the dean, the relevant program’s senior associate dean, the assistant dean, and the current chair of the Honor Committee shall have access to them. The senior associate dean and the chair will be responsible for passing committee files to the assistant dean to ensure the completeness of the committee files kept in the office of the assistant dean.
For each term, the secretary to the committee shall prepare a document entitled “Actions of the Honor Committee Academic Year: 20__ to 20__,” summarizing each case in which the committee saw fit to assess any form of punishment. Each summary shall include a description of the offense and the punishment assessed. These summaries shall not identify the students involved and so far as possible avoid contextual information that would reveal or encourage speculation about the identity of individual students. Honor Committee reports will be posted at the end of the academic year and at the beginning of the fall and spring terms.
The Yale School of Management has rigorous academic standards, designed to help students develop the depth of knowledge and understanding that they will need to be successful leaders. Classroom work is challenging and requires a substantial commitment in time and energy.
The School provides extensive resources to assist students in making the transition to management course work and improving their work in areas of difficulty. Students who fail to maintain the Quality Standard for their degree programs may be dismissed, subject to appeal, from the program.
Academic Tutoring and Support
The School provides a variety of resources to help students who are experiencing academic difficulty achieve the highest possible standard of academic excellence. To that end, tutoring is available for the quantitative components of the first-year core curriculum. In addition, the School’s Professional Communications Center is available to assist with written and/or oral communication skills. Information about the center and its services can be found on the SOM portal.
To access tutoring assistance, students should contact the senior associate director of academic affairs and student life and inform the senior associate director of the subject for which the student is seeking tutoring using the registration tool found on the tutoring page of the SOM portal. Such requests must be made prior to the fourth week of the term. Academic Affairs and Student Life will make every effort to accommodate such requests.
If a student who requests tutoring assistance fails to contact an assigned tutor within one week, does not inform Academic Affairs and Student Life that he/she no longer needs a tutor, or cancels two consecutive appointments with the tutor, the student will forfeit the right to participate in the tutoring program for the remainder of the academic year. If a student cancels a tutoring appointment with less than twenty-four hours’ advance notice, a $25 late cancellation fee will be assessed to the student.
Students should report any issues or concerns with the tutoring program to the assistant dean of academic affairs and student life.
Quality Standard for Scholarship Renewal
Institutional scholarships are awarded at the time of admission only. All scholarships will be renewed for the second year of study provided the student maintains strong academic standing. Strong academic standing requires that the student accumulates Pass or Fail grades in no more than 11 units of core courses.
For a full list of institutional scholarships, see the chapter Tuition and Fees.
Academic Grounds for Dismissal
Failure to meet the Quality Standard for each degree program results in dismissal from the respective program. The Quality of Standard for each program is described below. The decision of dismissal is subject to appeal before the Faculty Review Board. The appeal process is described in the next section.
Quality Standard for the Full-Time M.B.A. Program
A student falls short of the Quality Standard if he/she:
- 1. Accumulates Pass or Fail grades in more than 15 units of core courses; or
- 2. Accumulates a grade of Fail in more than 4 units of core courses; or
- 3. Accumulates Pass or Fail grades in 24 or more units of core and/or elective courses (17 or more units for joint-degree students).
Quality Standard for the M.B.A. for Executives Program
A student falls short of the Quality Standard if he/she:
- 1. Accumulates Pass or Fail grades in more than 15 units of core courses; or
- 2. Accumulates a grade of Fail in more than 4 units of core courses; or
- 3. Accumulates Pass or Fail grades in 24 or more units of core and/or elective courses.
Quality Standard for the M.A.M. Program
A student falls short of the Quality Standard if he/she:
- 1. Fails to receive credit in 40 units of course work by the end of the normal period of residency; or
- 2. Fails to receive a grade in at least four courses for each term or part of term; or
- 3. Accumulates Pass or Fail grades in 11 or more units of course work.
The registrar conducts a review of the academic progress of all M.B.A. and M.A.M. students at the end of each academic term. Students whose academic record is of concern are required to attend a mandatory meeting with the Academic Standards Committee. Administrative directors will notify all students who are referred to the Academic Standards Committee, making every reasonable effort to provide at least twenty-four hours’ notice before the student is to meet with the committee. The student may present to the committee, either orally or in writing, any information that he/she believes is relevant.
The Academic Standards Committee
The Academic Standards Committee is composed of faculty members who are appointed by the deputy dean. The membership of the committee is public and is disclosed upon request. For cases involving students in the full-time M.B.A. program, that program’s assistant dean of admissions and assistant dean of academic affairs and student life serve as members ex officio. For cases involving M.B.A. for Executives students, the committee consists of the senior associate dean, the dean of the program, and one ad hoc faculty member. For cases involving M.A.M. students, the director of the M.A.M. program serves as a member of the committee ex officio.
The committee’s primary purpose is to review cases and to provide counsel to students in academic difficulty. In addition, the committee serves as a faculty committee of review for exceptions to academic rules and for proposed changes to academic rules and/or policies.
Appeal of Academic Dismissal
A student who is dismissed for failure to meet the Quality Standard may appeal by written petition to the senior associate dean of the relevant academic program. An appeal must be filed within two weeks (ten working days) from the date of the letter notifying the student of the dismissal. The senior associate dean will refer the appeal to the Faculty Review Board. The Faculty Review Board, chaired by the senior associate dean, consists of the senior associate dean and two senior faculty members. The assistant dean or director of the program serves as a member ex officio of the Review Board.
In support of the appeal, the student should present any relevant information, including documentation of extenuating personal circumstances and other compelling facts relevant to the appeal. The Faculty Review Board is the highest level of appeal for all academic and disciplinary actions handled within Yale School of Management; its decision on a student’s appeal is final. Therefore, the appellant student must present all relevant information prior to the scheduled date of the Review Board’s deliberation of the appeal.
The Review Board will reach a final decision as soon as practically possible. A student who has been dismissed and has exhausted the appeal process cannot be readmitted except through the normal admission process.
A permanent file is created for each student upon admission to Yale SOM. This file contains the student’s application materials, acceptance letter, and registration forms, as well as copies of any additional correspondence with the student. Access to this file is governed by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). When a student graduates, his/her file is transferred to the Yale University Archives for permanent storage. A $15 fee will be charged if an alumnus/a requests student record retrieval from permanent storage.
Access to Records
Official student records for currently enrolled students are housed in the Registrar’s Office. Under FERPA, student records are accessible to faculty members, deans, and staff members who have a legitimate educational interest in reviewing the records. Students have automatic access to all parts of their own records except confidential recommendations submitted as part of the application for admission.
The following personal information may be released to the public unless a student requests otherwise: name, address, telephone number, dates of attendance, and degrees received. Any student may request that this information be treated confidentially.
Student transcripts are maintained permanently in the Registrar’s Office. From time to time, students may need to supply the official transcript to a potential employer or another third party. An official copy of a Yale SOM transcript will be released only on written request (with a signature) from the student or alumnus/a. To have a transcript issued, a student must complete a Transcript Request form, available from Academic Affairs and Student Life or on the Yale SOM Web site. Enrolled students may obtain transcripts free of charge. The fee for an alumnus/a is $7 for the initial transcript and $3 for each additional transcript requested at the same time.
As a matter of policy, only the grades of High Honors and Honors appear on a student’s official transcript.
Policies Related to Sexual Misconduct
Yale University is committed to maintaining and strengthening an educational, employment, and living environment founded on civility and mutual respect. Sexual misconduct is antithetical to the standards and ideals of our community, and it is a violation of Yale policy and the disciplinary regulations of Yale College and the graduate and professional schools. See the section Resources on Sexual Misconduct in the chapter Yale University Resources and Services for additional information.
In any community of diverse individuals, unanticipated conflicts or problems may arise. Students who are experiencing or who encounter problems of a personal nature, or who wish to discuss an issue affecting the entire community, should consult the assistant dean of academic affairs and student life. Cases involving possible cheating or plagiarism by students may be brought before the standing student-faculty Honor Committee. These matters should be brought to the attention of the assistant dean, who is an ex officio member of the Honor Committee.
Yale is committed to providing an atmosphere that is free of discrimination and sexual harassment. Complaints of discrimination brought by a student against a member of the faculty or staff on such bases as race, sex, religion, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, or handicap are addressed through the Yale School of Management Dean’s Procedure for Student Complaints. This procedure also may be used for informal complaints of sexual harassment brought by students against a member of the faculty or administration. Formal complaints of sexual misconduct, including sexual assault and sexual harassment, must be brought to the University-Wide Committee on Sexual Harassment; see Resources on Sexual Misconduct in the chapter Yale University Resources and Services. SOM’s Title IX coordinator, the deputy director of academic affairs and student life, also serves as a resource for informal student complaints or concerns.
The SOM Dean’s Procedure is posted on the SOM portal. The University-Wide Procedure for Complaints of Sexual Misconduct can be found at http://provost.yale.edu/uwc.
Students who are employed by any Yale SOM department are “student workers” and subject to this policy. Student workers include teaching assistants, research assistants, tutors, second-year advisers, CDO coaches, admissions interviewers, and International Experience course assistants, among others. No student may serve as a teaching assistant for any course in which he/she is enrolled for credit. No student may serve as a tutor for a course in which he/she is a teaching assistant.
Student workers are permitted to work up to twenty hours per week during an academic term in which they are registered in only four courses. Student workers registered for more than four courses in a term are permitted to work no more than ten hours per week. These weekly maximums apply to total hours worked in any combination of student worker roles and positions at Yale and are suspended during academic recess periods. First-year students are discouraged from working while completing the core curriculum. First-year students in academic difficulty who have been seen by the Academic Standards Committee are not eligible to be employed by SOM during the first year of study.
If the observance of a major religious holiday will prevent a student from attending class, the student should inform the instructor in advance. In the case of an involuntary hospitalization, the student should inform the instructor in advance if possible. Students missing class for these reasons may request to have core courses recorded. Classes missed for other reasons, including illness, job interviews, or other personal or professional commitments, will not be recorded. Core courses will be recorded only if the instructor is willing to grant permission for video or audio recording. Extracurricular events cannot be recorded at student request.
Requests for recording should be made to Academic Affairs and Student Life at least two weeks before a scheduled holiday, or as soon as feasible after an involuntary hospitalization. That office will review the request to decide if the course should be recorded, contact the course instructor to obtain permission for recording, and arrange for the recording.
Academic Affairs and Student Life may not be able to accommodate requests that are not received with at least two weeks’ advance notice. Students missing class for the observance of a major religious holiday or involuntary hospitalization are responsible for obtaining notes or handouts from a classmate and for checking the course Web site for any relevant postings.
Policy on Use of Photographic and Video Images and Audio Recordings
Photographs may be taken and video or audio recordings made by Yale SOM staff or other members of the Yale SOM or University community during Yale SOM and Yale University events and activities (including class sessions). By attending and/or participating in classes and in other Yale SOM and University activities, students agree to the University’s use and distribution of their image and/or voice in photographs, video or audio capture, or electronic reproductions of such classes and other Yale SOM and University activities (including alumni/ae activities). These images or excerpts are property of Yale University and may be included, for example, in course recordings supplied to students, on the Yale SOM Web site, and in Yale University publications, and may be otherwise used to support the University’s mission. Please contact the assistant dean of academic affairs and student life with any questions about this policy.
Yale SOM is a community of adults, and the responsible consumption of alcohol has a place within School- and student-organized events. The following guidelines apply whenever alcohol is purchased with School funds and/or served or consumed on School property.
Alcohol, whether purchased with School funds or purchased with private funds, may not be served or consumed on School property except in the context of School-sponsored or officially sanctioned club events. School funds may not be used to support private parties.
In accordance with Connecticut state law, alcoholic beverages may be dispensed only to individuals who are twenty-one or more years old and may not be dispensed to any intoxicated person.
Alcohol that is purchased with School funds and/or served on the SOM campus must be served by a bartender who (1) is certified by TIPS or a similar organization, (2) is not an SOM student, and (3) remains on duty for the entire time that alcohol is served. “School funds” are any monies in or disbursed from Yale University accounts.
Beer and wine are the only alcoholic beverages that may be served. Whenever alcohol is served, appropriate quantities of nonalcoholic beverages and food must be available at the same location.
Any exceptions to this policy must be approved in writing by the assistant dean.
Violations of any of the School of Management alcohol policies and procedures may be referred to the Honor Committee for disciplinary action.
Purchasing Card Use Policy
When a student who is not a club budget officer uses an Academic Affairs and Student Life purchasing card (p-card), the student must present an authorization form signed by the appropriate club budget officer. Authorization must include event name and date, name of vendor, items/services to be purchased via p-card, business purpose for purchase, and estimated amount of purchase.
Appropriate original, itemized receipts for p-card purchases should be submitted to Academic Affairs and Student Life by the end of the next business day after the p-card is used. If appropriate receipts are not submitted within five (5) business days, the amount of the purchase may be billed to the student’s bursar account and/or the club may lose p-card privileges for the remainder of the academic year.
For both the Enterprise Learning Credit (ELC) and club reimbursements, students are responsible for documenting the expense and documenting who paid the expense. Receipts and bank statements must be uploaded to the online request form, which must be accurately and completely prepared. For club reimbursements, the budget officer must authorize the expense being charged to the club accounts. The above documentation must be submitted to Academic Affairs and Student Life within ten (10) business days of the date the expense was incurred, or payment may be denied.
Solicitation of alumni, faculty, or staff is not permitted without approval from the Office of Development and Alumni Relations. Guidelines are available from Academic Affairs and Student Life.
Policies on the Use of Information Technology Facilities
All members of the Yale SOM community are expected to be aware of and comply with the following policies and procedures, which are intended to ensure the reliable and secure delivery of information technology services in support of the academic and administrative mission of the School.
Information technology at Yale University is governed by a set of policies, procedures, and guidelines (http://its.yale.edu/forms-policies/policies). All users of Yale SOM computing and network services, including those provided by the University, are expected to read and abide by the Information Technology Appropriate Use policy (http://its.yale.edu/forms-policies/appropriate-use), as well as any other applicable policies. In the following summary of the Appropriate Use policy, “IT Systems” refers to systems, networks, and facilities owned, managed, or maintained by any entity of Yale University, including SOM, as well as privately owned computers used for University business activities or connected to the Yale network.
- • Appropriate use IT Systems exists to support the research, education, and administrative work of the School and University. No other use is authorized without explicit permission.
- • Authorized use Users are entitled to access only those elements of IT Systems that are consistent with their authorization.
- • Prohibited use The following categories of use are prohibited: use that impedes, interferes with, impairs, or otherwise causes harm to the activities of others; use that is inconsistent with Yale’s nonprofit status; use of IT Systems in a way that suggests University or SOM endorsement of any political candidate or ballot initiative; harassing or threatening use; use damaging the integrity of University, SOM, or other IT Systems; use in violation of the law; use in violation of University contracts; use in violation of University policy; and use in violation of external data network policies.
- • Free inquiry and expression Users of IT Systems may exercise rights of free inquiry and expression consistent with the principles of the 1975 Report of the Committee on Freedom of Expression at Yale and the limits of the law.
- • Personal account responsibility Users are responsible for maintaining the security of their IT Systems accounts and passwords.
- • Encryption of data Users are encouraged to encrypt files, documents, and messages for protection against inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure while in storage or in transit over data networks.
- • Responsibility for content Individual offices publishing official University information in electronic form are responsible for that content. All other content published on or over IT Systems shall be treated as the private speech of an individual user.
- • Personal identification Upon request by a systems administrator or other University authority, users must produce valid University identification.
- • Conditions of University access Notwithstanding the high value the University places on privacy, there are circumstances in which the University may determine that University access to IT Systems is warranted without the consent of the user and after following carefully prescribed processes.
- • Enforcement procedures An individual who believes he/she may have been harmed by an alleged violation of this policy or who has observed or been made aware of a violation may make a report to the director of the SOM Information Technology Group or to the University Information Security Office. Alleged violations will be pursued in accordance with the appropriate disciplinary procedures for faculty, staff, and students. Individuals found to have violated these policies may face IT-specific penalties, including the temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of some or all IT privileges and penalties provided for in other University policies. They may also be subject to criminal prosecution, civil liability, or both for unlawful use of any IT System. When appropriate, violations will be forwarded to the SOM Honor Committee for review.
SOM-IT Systems users are expected to be familiar with and follow these guidelines.
- • Student hardware All students are expected to provide a computer meeting SOM minimum specifications and configure it themselves for use during their degree program. SOM-IT provides instructions for downloading and installing required software and other configuration steps. The SOM-IT Help Desk will make reasonable efforts to support students using computer models that meet minimum specifications.
- • Password security Maintain confidentiality of your passwords at all times. University and SOM-IT personnel will never ask for passwords via e-mail. SOM-IT personnel may ask for your password in order to install software or repair your student hardware. You have the right to know how the password will be used and change it before and after SOM-IT has worked on your computer.
- • Phishing and other attacks Question any attempt to gather personal information such as passwords, user names, and other personal information via e-mail or other electronic means. Contact the SOM-IT Help Desk if you are concerned about a specific request.
- • Data security The University and SOM-IT have deployed an extensive array of information security services in order to safeguard University and personal data. These methods are effective, but information being transmitted over data networks or stored in some environments cannot be perfectly secure. Users may choose to encrypt files, e-mail, and other data for a higher level of protection. More information can be found on the Yale ITS site Secure Computing at Yale (www.yale.edu/its/secure-computing). Users encrypting their data should take special precaution to safely store the keys. Without them, SOM-IT will not be able to recover the data.
- • Data backup It is highly recommended that you acquire software and services to provide data backup. Become familiar with its operation and ensure that your information is properly being protected by periodically reviewing the history log. The Box at Yale file-sharing and storage workspace can be used at no cost to upload and synchronize files for a form of data backup.
- • Classroom technology SOM classrooms are equipped with digital projectors, audio systems, and other technology useful in teaching and learning. Please contact the SOM-IT Help Desk if you require any assistance in the proper use of these systems.
- • Problem resolution If your student computer is not working properly or if you experience difficulty in using any SOM or Yale IT System, the SOM-IT Help Desk is available to assist you during normal business hours at its location adjacent to the Student Lounge; by phone, 203.432.7777; or by e-mail, email@example.com.
Firearms and Weapons
The possession of explosives, guns, ammunition, air rifles, paintball and pellet guns, BB guns, Tasers, knives, or other weapons on the Yale SOM campus is prohibited.
University and School Names and Logos
The Yale University and Yale School of Management names, logotypes, and seals (in all formats) are protected by copyright law. Further, it is of great importance that faculty, students, and staff representing Yale SOM use the School’s established graphic standards. Any use of the name or logotype in the title or caption of a publication or organization, any use of the above-mentioned on stationery or business cards, or their use on any item or product to be distributed or sold by an individual or an organization must be approved by the SOM Office of Communications and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the Yale Trademark Licensing Program. For further information, contact the Yale School of Management Office of Communications at 203.432.6009 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Policies and Guidelines of the Career Development Office (CDO)
The Yale School of Management Career Development Office provides resources and support throughout the internship and full-time recruiting process. Students are expected to take responsibility for their job searches and to represent the School well by acting professionally in all interactions. Professional conduct conveys the shared values of our community and benefits all students.
All questions regarding student or employer recruiting policies should be directed to email@example.com.
CDO Advising Appointments
Advising appointments are made via the CDO Recruiting System. In the event that a student needs to cancel an advising appointment, he/she must do so via the CDO Recruiting System as far in advance as is feasible. For “just-in-time” needs, call or stop by the CDO.
The CDO offers a series of in-person and online professional development programs during the academic year; the schedule for this curriculum is listed on the SOM portal and in the CDO Recruiting System. For those sessions that require an RSVP, please be respectful of your peers and SOM staff by canceling in advance if you have a change in plans. Doing so will enable other students to attend in your place.
CDO Résumé Database/Résumé Review Process
The CDO organizes an annual class Résumé Database for employers. To ensure consistency and ease of use by all potential Yale SOM employers, students are required to submit résumés written and formatted according to the SOM résumé template; résumés not meeting the SOM template format will be excluded from the Résumé Database. Students who wish to opt out of the SOM Résumé Database must inform the CDO by e-mail by the résumé deadline (to be announced).
The Recruiting Process
Employer Events and Interactions
Students will interact with employers throughout their experience at Yale SOM. Whether in educational or recruiting contexts, students are expected to represent themselves and the School well by conducting themselves professionally. Professional conduct includes asking relevant and appropriate questions during Q&A sessions and appropriately managing attendance (“no showing,” arriving late, leaving early, etc., are examples of poor professional conduct). For student clubs organizing company visits, relevant “trek preparation” material that further discusses various aspects of professionalism is available.
Students may not miss class for interviews, recruiting events, or travel related to these or other recruiting activities. Employers may not require a student, as a condition of his/her employment candidacy, to interview or attend an event at a time that conflicts with his/her individual academic schedule. To avoid class conflicts, the CDO expects that all interviews take place outside of scheduled academic commitments.
Recruiting Period for Internships
In order to give employers equal access to qualified candidates, to give students sufficient time to explore relevant internship opportunities, and to allow students to have the benefit of the School’s career management preparatory curriculum, first-year recruiting events should not be held before the internship recruiting period begins on September 20, 2016. Yale SOM requests that firms recruiting both on- and off-campus begin interviewing students on or after the first day of on-campus recruiting, Monday, January 3, 2017.
Students are expected to act in good faith when applying to positions and interviewing. Upon verbal or written acceptance of an employment offer, a student must cease interviewing with other firms and cancel all scheduled interviews. Sending a note of explanation/apology for canceling upcoming interviews is an expected professional courtesy and an important part of long-term relationship management. Cancellations for any reason that occur less than two days before a scheduled interview require that students copy the CDO on the e-mail to the firm.
Making and Accepting Offers
Offer Timelines and Acceptance Policy
Offer timelines, for both internship and full-time offers, should not preempt a student’s ability to participate in the on-campus recruiting process. For internship offers, Yale SOM recommends a decision period of three weeks. Full-time offers extended at the completion of an internship should remain open until November 30, 2016; for all other full-time offers Yale SOM recommends a decision period of four weeks. Offer deadlines should not preempt a student’s full participation in on-campus recruiting/interviewing. After the on-campus period for internship and full-time opportunities begins to attenuate (January for full-time recruiting, March for internship recruiting), it is reasonable to expect a shorter one- to two-week timeframe for a candidate decision.
In general, SOM asks that students work with employers to identify mutually agreeable offer response deadlines. A student who feels that the amount of time permitted to make a decision is not reasonable should communicate to the firm how much time is required and why the time is needed. Students who would like to discuss how to approach a firm to negotiate more time or who are unable to secure a reasonable decision period should contact the CDO to discuss next steps.
After accepting an offer, students must complete the Employment Survey in the CDO Recruiting System.
Reneging on an Employment Offer
Definition of a Renege
“Reneging” means that a student has accepted an offer of employment—verbally or in writing—and subsequently turns down that offer for any reason. Acceptance of an offer should be made with the sincere intention to honor your commitment. Once you accept an offer, you must withdraw from consideration with all other employers you are pursuing, including any interviews you may have scheduled, with an explanation that you have accepted another offer.
Yale SOM Policy on Reneges
It is to be stressed that Yale SOM takes reneging extremely seriously. We expect the highest degree of professionalism from all members of our community; reneges cause significant harm to your professional reputation and severely damage the relationships shared by the Yale SOM community. What may seem like an individual choice in fact affects your classmates, alumni, and the overall reputation of Yale SOM.
Reneging goes against the Yale SOM Honor Code, and the potential ramifications of the decision to renege on an accepted offer are consistent with those of an ethics violation. Instances of reneging will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. All students are expected to be accountable for their actions and to take appropriate steps to address the situation with the affected employer. Other potential consequences could include revocation of school leadership positions, loss of study abroad privileges, and removal from the Yale SOM Résumé Database, among others. Cases may be forwarded to the Yale SOM Honor Committee for review. Consultation with the CDO early in the decision-making process will be viewed positively when considering your case and can mitigate potential ramifications of a decision to renege.
Why Early Consultation Matters
It is critical that you reach out to the CDO in the early stages of the decision-making process. Reneging always has serious consequences, but the outcomes of a poorly handled decision to renege can be particularly damaging. The CDO can provide valuable input, including ideas and options that you may not have previously considered, which could result in a more positive outcome. In the event that you are considering reneging on an accepted offer, it is imperative that you meet with the CDO director and relationship manager in the relevant industry coverage area before initiating any communication with the employer. Once again, your early outreach to the CDO will be beneficial to you when your case is reviewed.
Professional Standards for Employers
Yale SOM holds all parties involved in the recruiting relationship to the highest professional standards. We take instances of unprofessional conduct by employers very seriously. Please bring any such cases to the attention of the CDO, including receipt of an “exploding offer,” rescindment of a previously extended employment offer, and any other egregious actions taken by an employer, so that we may address them appropriately.